Coach Carter Assignment

Coach Carter solicitude Assignment In the movie, Coach Carter, it is seen that the bus topologying style of Carter differs from most. In roam to be eligible to play for the capital of Virginia hoops police squad, the players moldiness watch a strict regime bring outlined in a decoct that they are to sign. Some of the regains are that individu solelyy team member must maintain a 2. 3 GPA, be seated in campaign of all their disseveres, and wear a shirt and tie. As it is obvious, most coaches do non sport such set of rules. Most coaches totally submit that the players show up for practice and thats it.Looking closely at his mode of coaching, there are twain positive and negative sights that surround it. Firstly, his rule of all students must be seated in front of the class is perceived as a positive aspect. In the movie, it was express that capital of Virginia had a very(prenominal) low success rate. Only 50% of students refine from Richmond, and the majority of th ose were girls. This shows that the other half either stay back, or hold outt pursue a higher reproduction. With this rule enforced among the players, this leave behind en able them to focus more in class as they provide be closer to the teacher allowing them to understand what is going on in class.This ordain ultimately benefit them as they will be able to graduate and not be part of the 50% who stay back. Carter similarly postulate that the players maintain an average of 2. 3. This can be seen as both a positive and negative aspect. Carter made this rule because this is the average required for students to be admitted to college/university. In Carters eyes, these players are talented hoops players and if they are able to maintain that average, they will get certainly get into a college where they are offered a basketball scholarship. This shows the advantageous aspect of this rule.However, the negative aspect is that there are those who joined skillful to simply play bask etball. As such, they will not like these rules. In the movie, it is seen that Richmond is a very violent area filled with gangs. If the players are not allowed to play basketball because they do not follow these sets of rules, they will not see a hobby and may potentially be involved in gangs. This is seen in the movie where the parents complained to Carter, stating that the only rea word of honor their son isnt involved in gangs is that because they have a hobby such as basketball.One of the management theories seen by Coach Carter is the Administrative Principles by Henri Fayol. This is seen through his applications of division of labour, discipline, and unity of direction. section of Labour is seen where he decides who is the spot guard for the team, and who should be the person who posts the triple storeyers. For example, Carter made Timo Cruz the person in charge of taking three point shots because that was his specialty. This coincides with one of the regulations from the theory of Scientific Management which says that managers should carefully select workers with the upright abilities for the line of descents.Discipline was evident during the court scene where a trial was held in regards to Carter cancelling Richmonds basketball games because the players did not experience his expectations, i. e. GPA is lower than 2. 3. Carter said that if the students are unable to follow a simple contract that they concur to, how would this make them be responsible heap in the real contrive? As such, his use of making all members sticking to the agreements they signed taught them discipline. The principle of Unity of direction was evident in the final basketball game.Carter would announce the team a certain plan, and all the players did what they had to do to execute the plan. A principle of Bureaucratic Organization, by Max Weber, was seen as well up by Carter. Carter followed the principle of impersonality. The principle of impersonality states that the rules and procedures practiced should be the same for all. For example, when a member is late for practice, they are to do pushups and suicides etc. When his own son came late, he made his son do the same and did not palliate him just because of their father-son relationship. This shows that Carter is equitable towards all.In my opinion, Carter is a good manager because not only did he make Richmond one of the most successful basketball team plainly does things that benefits the students on the team as well. Firstly, is because of the expectations that he sets out for each student. In order to continue playing for the school basketball team, they must sign a contract promising to achieve staple fibre academic standards. This makes him a good manager because not only does he want the team to win their basketball games, but he cares for each and each individual member by making sure that they have the marks required for further education.Secondly, is that he is not afraid to t ake action. Sometimes, when things go wrong in a team, the manager/coach just let it slide because he/her is afraid of ruining the relationship mingled with them and the team. As seen in the movie, Carter announced a lockout for the Richmond basketball team when he notices that the some of the students did not meet the 2. 3 average. This means that they were not allowed to access the gym for practice, or participate in any games. The primer coat he did this is because again, he wants the students to put effort into school in promise of a better life portraying that he cares for students on the team.Lastly, is that he promotes a good sense of teamwork. This ties in with the last example to the highest degree the lockout. There were people on the team who met the 2. 3 GPA but there were some who didnt. Instead of just banning those who did not meet the standards, he banned the whole team from playing. He wanted every member to support one another and succeed as a whole. Overall, Ca rter is a great coach because not only did he roll Richmond into a successful basketball team, but cared for each and every member by ensuring that they have the marks needed for higher education etc.If I was the coach, I would mainly use principles from Henri Fayol and The Hawthorne Studies and Human Relations. discussion section of Labour, unity of direction, and equity would be found in my style of coaching. I would divide the work up by ability. For example, in basketball, if I was the coach I would make a person who is small but have good shooting skills be responsible for taking three point shots. By telling them that this is their job, this person would not drive into the key and go for a layup because they are small and would possibly be blocked. This job would be saved for a bigger person.As such, if each member contend their assigned role, there would be no weakness as they will not conflict with others jobs that are not their forte. The root of unity of direction wher e the leader makes a single plan and all members execute that plan is in my opinion, very effective. This is because I, as the coach, would want what is take up for the team. With this mentality, I would devise a plan that is most effective. If the coach doesnt come up with a plan, someone on the team expertness have their own ambitions, and do their own thing such as taking tricky shots to impress the crowd.This might result in a loss. I also believe in equity where managers should be liberal and fair. This is because if coaches are nice to their players, this would achieve more productivity. The Hawthorne Studies and Human Relations showed that peoples feelings, attitudes and relationships with coworkers affect their work and that those who are nicer to their employees will allow them to run more work. As such, if I were a coach, I would use a mix of Henri Fayol and The Hawthorne Studies and Human Relations theory.