Economic conditions Essay

In this essay Im deviation to argue that social, political, or economical conditions cannot alter the nature and meaning of art, with specific reference to trains of art from fancy and Rococo epochs. Evaluating a work of art is always a complicated task. Since the perception of art and looker is full(prenominal)ly subjective, its hard to think of universal criteria to measure tasteful qualities of a indisputable member. However, there is a broad consensus among the critics that there atomic number 18 certain criteria they apply when judging an art work.Its possible to concenter on four main criteria to judge an art work. First and foremost, the piece should be aesthetically pleasing, i. e. correspond to the all-common notion of apricot. It should be harmonious and evoking positive, advance feelings. time there is a trend among just about contemporary artists to key away their pieces arouse indignation and disgust with a view to delivering a certain gist or merely a stonishing the public, I strongly calculate that art and aesthetics are inherently linked.For instance, a typical eccentric of baroque sculpture St. Theresa in Ecstasy of the church of Santa Maria della Vittoria, capital of Italy created by Bernini is perfect in its form, since it captures the beauty and harmony together with drift and energy. Same is true about Rococo sculpture looking at Amour menacant created by Etienne Maurice Falconet, its impossible not to admire the high degree of sophistication and perfection the statue of the little angel embodies.The second monetary standard Im going to use is quality of workmanship, i. e. the mastery of artists skills. another(prenominal) criterion which is very important is the uniqueness of artists manner. Great artists stand out for the peculiarity of their individual style. Some of them prefer to pioneer new forms and techniques, in time this is not a prerequisite for creating a style of your own. Many capable artists dont bre ak away from the tradition but alone find their own niche within the existing patterns of expression.While some artists of the Baroque and Rococo epoch were considered rebellious, e. g. Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, they didnt violate sanctioned rules of harmonious and aesthetically pleasing artistic expression. Jean-Honore Fragonards manner was as well as innovative in many instances, sine he introduced a breakable interplay of light and shadow as well as implicit amativeness into mainstream French painting, however he adhered to the generally accepted notion of what beauty and art are.Finally, the forth criterion is the message the piece is trying to send. here(predicate) its necessary to take into account the importance and relevance of the message as well as how successful the piece is in delivering it. Baroque and Rococo painters mainly focused on the depiction of unreal and religious scenes as well as the scenes from the daily life of the upper circles of society.Wh ile both themes that dominated the artistic discourse might seem to be detached from the real life, they served an important goal of educating the public about mythological and religious narratives or captured the spirit of their times through the portrayal of the favour members of society The most persuasive proof of the thesis that social, political, or economic conditions cannot alter the nature and meaning of art is the fact that nowadays we stillness admire great works of art irrespective of the epoch they hold up to.